On Sat, Mar 08, 2014 at 03:39:48PM +0800, clanlab.proj wrote: > Hi Dave and Greg, > > On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 12:04 AM, Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 11:42:49PM +0800, Weinn Jheng wrote: > >> In order to reduce the interrupt times in the embedded system, > >> a receiving workqueue is introduced. > >> This modification also enhanced the overall throughput as the > >> benefits of reducing interrupt occurrence. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Weinn Jheng <clanlab.proj@xxxxxxxxx> > >> Cc: David Brownell <dbrownell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Dave, does this look ok from NAPI point of view ? > > I've found the another patch NAPI version has been taken by Greg. I did? What git commit id is it? > But I didn't remembered I've seen the further comment from Dave. > Since the performance will be a little bit slower then work queue > according to my experiment before. > Could someone please give me the comment about the decisions of pros and cons? > Because I have no idea if there will be further improvement is needed > for patching NAPI version to work queue. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
