Hi Dave and Greg, On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 12:04 AM, Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 11:42:49PM +0800, Weinn Jheng wrote: >> In order to reduce the interrupt times in the embedded system, >> a receiving workqueue is introduced. >> This modification also enhanced the overall throughput as the >> benefits of reducing interrupt occurrence. >> >> Signed-off-by: Weinn Jheng <clanlab.proj@xxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: David Brownell <dbrownell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Dave, does this look ok from NAPI point of view ? I've found the another patch NAPI version has been taken by Greg. But I didn't remembered I've seen the further comment from Dave. Since the performance will be a little bit slower then work queue according to my experiment before. Could someone please give me the comment about the decisions of pros and cons? Because I have no idea if there will be further improvement is needed for patching NAPI version to work queue. Thanks! Best regards, Weinn Jheng -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
