On Mon, 3 Feb 2014, Paul Bolle wrote:
> > > >> --- a/drivers/usb/phy/phy.c
> > > >> +++ b/drivers/usb/phy/phy.c
> > > >> @@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ struct usb_phy *usb_get_phy_dev(struct device *dev, u8 index)
> > > >>
> > > >> phy = __usb_find_phy_dev(dev, &phy_bind_list, index);
> > > >> if (IS_ERR(phy) || !try_module_get(phy->dev->driver->owner)) {
> > > >> - pr_err("unable to find transceiver\n");
> > > >> + pr_debug("unable to find transceiver\n");
> > > >> goto err0;
> > > >> }
> > > >
> > > > Wouldn't it make more sense to change this to dev_debug? As it stands,
> > > > the user has no idea which device is lacking a transceiver.
> > >
> > > Quite possibly, yes. I'm not overly familiar with the subsystem and
> > > was just writing up what Felipe suggested.
> > >
> > > > (The same is probably true for other log messages in this source file.)
> > >
> > > I don't disagree, but I'd rather someone with more experience in the
> > > USB subsystem do that kind of broader audit/change. I'd be happy to
> > > test.
> >
> > yeah, I just sent a patch where I forgot to switch over to dev_dbg(), if
> > you can do that for both messages and remove the out of memory message,
> > I'd be glad to take your patch instead of mine.
>
> This message cab still be seen when booting v3.14-rc1. Is a patch to
> downgrade this message to dev_dbg() - from Josh, Felipe or someone else
> - queued somewhere?
http://marc.info/?l=linux-usb&m=139092084714232&w=2
As far as I know, this hasn't been merged into anybody's tree yet. And
Felipe is on vacation for a few weeks. Still, it should get in before
3.14 is released.
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
