On 01/08/2014 04:25 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Wednesday 08 January 2014 11:52:44 Sebastian Reichel wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 03:39:36PM +0530, Roger Quadros wrote: >>>> What about the other clocks acquired in drivers/mfd/omap-usb-host.c? Shouldn't >>>> all of those be provided by via the DT phandle? >>> >>> All those clocks are identically named across the OMAP SoCs and are unique for each >>> SoC, so providing DT phandle for all of them is not required. >>> >>> The init_60m_fclk was renamed to l3init_60m_fclk in OMAP5, and hence the need for >>> this binding. >> >> I understand the intention of this patch. I was just wondering if >> all the clocks should be referenced from DT even if that is not >> strictly needed at the moment. This would make clocks similar to >> other resources like regulators, gpios, irqs, ... >> >> Having the clocks referenced from DT looks cleaner to me. It means I >> can check the DT file for any resources used by a driver. It also >> creates some kind of consistency in the kernel. > > I think that would be best, yes. AFAIK most other platforms do this > already, OMAP is a bit behind because it started using clocks when the > infrastructure for doing this right was still incomplete. > OK. I'll update the binding information to reflect all the clocks. But what about clk_get() vs of_clk_get_by_name() ? cheers, -roger -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
