The first Warning occurs in the test before (Interface Descriptor Test): ... INFO Device does not use a class-specific protocol on this interface INFO ENGLISH_US language string descriptor is : Source/Sink INFO Calling SetInterface(), InterfaceNumber=0, AlternateSetting=0 WARNING SetInterface with interface number : 0 failed. And then the next test (Endpoint Descriptor Test - Configured State): ERROR Get configuration descriptor failed for configuration index : 0 On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Marco Zamponi <mzamponi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Shouldn't the usb.c user space application be compliant (e.g. pass all >>> the CV Tests) ? >> >> Yes it should. > > For some reason though, it does not. The "Endpoint Descriptor Test - > Configured State" is where it fails. > > - regards > > On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 07 2014, Marco Zamponi wrote: >>> Actually, I was referring to gadgetFS all along. >> >> In that case everything I've written may be inapplicable. >> >>> Shouldn't the usb.c user space application be compliant (e.g. pass all >>> the CV Tests) ? >> >> Yes it should. >> >> -- >> Best regards, _ _ >> .o. | Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of o' \,=./ `o >> ..o | Computer Science, Michał "mina86" Nazarewicz (o o) >> ooo +--<mpn@xxxxxxxxxx>--<xmpp:mina86@xxxxxxxxxx>--ooO--(_)--Ooo-- >> >> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
