Actually, I was referring to gadgetFS all along. Shouldn't the usb.c user space application be compliant (e.g. pass all the CV Tests) ? On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 07 2014, Marco Zamponi wrote: >> I am testing now the unchanged usb.c example >> (www.linux-usb.org/gadget/usb.c) as user space application on my ARM >> Cortex A5 with atmel_usba_udc driver. > > Note that usb.c uses GadgetFS *not* FunctionFS. Unfortunately there are > slight incompatibilities between the two, and user space application > written for GadgetFS won't work with FunctionFS out of the box. > > -- > Best regards, _ _ > .o. | Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of o' \,=./ `o > ..o | Computer Science, Michał “mina86” Nazarewicz (o o) > ooo +--<mpn@xxxxxxxxxx>--<xmpp:mina86@xxxxxxxxxx>--ooO--(_)--Ooo-- > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
