On 01/07/2014 08:43 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Tuesday 07 January 2014, Roger Quadros wrote: >> USB Host driver (drivers/mfd/omap-usb-host.c) expects the 60MHz >> reference clock to be named "init_60m_fclk". Provide this >> information. >> >> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@xxxxxx> >> --- >> arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5.dtsi | 2 ++ >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5.dtsi >> index 2f12a47..e0ab379 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5.dtsi >> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5.dtsi >> @@ -765,6 +765,8 @@ >> #address-cells = <1>; >> #size-cells = <1>; >> ranges; >> + clocks = <&l3init_60m_fclk>; >> + clock-names = "init_60m_fclk"; >> >> usbhsohci: ohci@4a064800 { >> compatible = "ti,ohci-omap3", "usb-ohci"; > > The bindings/mfd/omap-usb-host.txt file doesn't document any clocks. > Please create another patch to document the clock names in this binding > before you start putting them into the dtsi file. So far the clock > names are an implementation detail of Linux as they are not part > of the binding, and with your patch it becomes part of the ABI. > Right. I'll re-post the series. cheers, -roger -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html