Re: [0/4] overlayfs: Adjustments for ovl_fill_super()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


>> See also:
> I will queue cleanup patches 1-2,

Thanks for this positive feedback.

>                                   but I do not like patches 3/4 and 4/4.
> I do not think that they make the code better to read or maintain.

I would appreciate if the details for such change reluctance can be clarified better.


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems Devel]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux