Re: [0/4] overlayfs: Adjustments for ovl_fill_super()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>> See also:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/cocci/87b65f8e-abde-2aff-4da8-df6e0b464677@xxxxxx/
>> https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/cocci/2023-03/msg00115.html
>
> I will queue cleanup patches 1-2,

Thanks for this positive feedback.


>                                   but I do not like patches 3/4 and 4/4.
> I do not think that they make the code better to read or maintain.

I would appreciate if the details for such change reluctance can be clarified better.

Regards,
Markus





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems Devel]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux