Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] ovl: Add documentation on nesting of overlayfs mounts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 3:31 PM Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 2:05 PM Alexander Larsson <alexl@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alexander Larsson <alexl@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/filesystems/overlayfs.rst | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/overlayfs.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/overlayfs.rst
> > index 35853906accb..e38b2f5fadaf 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/filesystems/overlayfs.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/overlayfs.rst
> > @@ -492,6 +492,28 @@ directory tree on the same or different underlying filesystem, and even
> >  to a different machine.  With the "inodes index" feature, trying to mount
> >  the copied layers will fail the verification of the lower root file handle.
> >
> > +Nesting overlayfs mounts
> > +------------------------
> > +
> > +It is possible to use a lower directory that is stored on an overlayfs
> > +mount. For regular files this does not need any special care. However, files
> > +that have overlayfs attributes, such as whiteouts or `overlay.*` xattrs will
> > +be interpreted by the underlying overlayfs mount and stripped out. In order to
> > +allow the second overlayfs mount to see the attributes they must be escaped.
> > +
> > +Overlayfs specific xattrs are escaped by using a special prefix of
> > +`overlay.overlay.`. So, a file with a `trusted.overlay.overlay.metacopy` xattr
> > +in the lower dir will be exposed as a regular file with a
> > +`trusted.overlay.metacopy` xattr in the overlayfs mount. This can be nested
> > +by repeating the prefix multiple time, as each instance only removes one
> > +prefix.
> > +
> > +Whiteouts files marked with a `overlay.nowhiteout` xattr will cause overlayfs
> > +not to treat them as a whiteout. Since this xattr is then stripped out, the
> > +next layer will instead apply the whiteout.
> > +
> > +Files created via overlayfs will automatically be created with the right
> > +escapes in the upper directory.
> >
>
> I was wondering why you used `` around xattr names.
> Is that intentional? I am not an expert in rst format, but
> other places in this doc use "" around xattr names and it
> does not look like the formatting of `` is handled well by github at least:
> https://github.com/alexlarsson/linux/blob/ovl-nesting/Documentation/filesystems/overlayfs.rst

I guess I'm just too used to markdown. Will change to ".

-- 
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
 Alexander Larsson                                Red Hat, Inc
       alexl@xxxxxxxxxx         alexander.larsson@xxxxxxxxx





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems Devel]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux