Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] ovl: Add documentation on nesting of overlayfs mounts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 2:05 PM Alexander Larsson <alexl@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Larsson <alexl@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  Documentation/filesystems/overlayfs.rst | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/overlayfs.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/overlayfs.rst
> index 35853906accb..e38b2f5fadaf 100644
> --- a/Documentation/filesystems/overlayfs.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/overlayfs.rst
> @@ -492,6 +492,28 @@ directory tree on the same or different underlying filesystem, and even
>  to a different machine.  With the "inodes index" feature, trying to mount
>  the copied layers will fail the verification of the lower root file handle.
>
> +Nesting overlayfs mounts
> +------------------------
> +
> +It is possible to use a lower directory that is stored on an overlayfs
> +mount. For regular files this does not need any special care. However, files
> +that have overlayfs attributes, such as whiteouts or `overlay.*` xattrs will
> +be interpreted by the underlying overlayfs mount and stripped out. In order to
> +allow the second overlayfs mount to see the attributes they must be escaped.
> +
> +Overlayfs specific xattrs are escaped by using a special prefix of
> +`overlay.overlay.`. So, a file with a `trusted.overlay.overlay.metacopy` xattr
> +in the lower dir will be exposed as a regular file with a
> +`trusted.overlay.metacopy` xattr in the overlayfs mount. This can be nested
> +by repeating the prefix multiple time, as each instance only removes one
> +prefix.
> +
> +Whiteouts files marked with a `overlay.nowhiteout` xattr will cause overlayfs
> +not to treat them as a whiteout. Since this xattr is then stripped out, the
> +next layer will instead apply the whiteout.
> +
> +Files created via overlayfs will automatically be created with the right
> +escapes in the upper directory.
>

I was wondering why you used `` around xattr names.
Is that intentional? I am not an expert in rst format, but
other places in this doc use "" around xattr names and it
does not look like the formatting of `` is handled well by github at least:
https://github.com/alexlarsson/linux/blob/ovl-nesting/Documentation/filesystems/overlayfs.rst

Thanks,
Amir.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems Devel]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux