On Sat, 8 Apr 2023 at 18:43, Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > For the common case of single lower layer, embed ovl_entry with a > single lower path in ovl_inode, so no stack allocation is needed. This makes ovl_inode grow by 8 bytes, right? That's a win only in the numlower = 1 case, in the other cases it's a net loss, so it might not be worth it even without the added complexity. Thanks, Miklos
