> I'm working this into the next batch bound for 5.6, unless something
> more urgent comes up before that.
>
overlayfs-next tested.
ovl-ino rebased.
You would probably want to squash the "merge conflict" below to overlayfs-next.
Thanks,
Amir.
--- a/fs/overlayfs/super.c
+++ b/fs/overlayfs/super.c
@@ -1348,7 +1348,7 @@ static int ovl_get_layers(struct super_block
*sb, struct ovl_fs *ofs,
*/
err = get_anon_bdev(&ofs->fs[0].pseudo_dev);
if (err) {
- pr_err("overlayfs: failed to get anonymous bdev for
upper fs\n");
+ pr_err("failed to get anonymous bdev for upper fs\n");
goto out;
}
@@ -1409,7 +1409,7 @@ static int ovl_get_layers(struct super_block
*sb, struct ovl_fs *ofs,
*/
if (ofs->numfs - !ofs->upper_mnt == 1) {
if (ofs->config.xino == OVL_XINO_ON)
- pr_info("overlayfs: \"xino=on\" is useless
with all layers on same fs, ignore.\n");
+ pr_info("\"xino=on\" is useless with all
layers on same fs, ignore.\n");
ofs->xino_mode = 0;
} else if (ofs->config.xino == OVL_XINO_ON && ofs->xino_mode < 0) {
