Re: [PATCH v2] ovl: improving copy-up efficiency for big sparse file

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



 ---- 在 星期四, 2019-10-31 14:53:15 Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx> 撰写 ----
 > >  > Yes, overlayfs does not comply with this "posix"' test.
 > >  > This is why it was removed from the auto and quick groups.
 > >
 > > So I'm curious what is the purpose for the test?
 > >
 > 
 > This is a POSIX compliance test.
 > It is meant to "remind" us that this behavior is not POSIX compliant
 > and that we should fix it one day...
 > A bit controversial to have a test like this without a roadmap
 > when it is going to be fixed in xfstests, but it's there.

I haven't checked carefully for the detail but It seems  feasible if we copy-up lower file  during mmap regardless of ro/rw mode.
Is it acceptable  by slightly changing copy-up assumption to fulfill POSIX compliance? Or we just wait for a better solution?

Thanks,
Chengguang






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems Devel]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux