> 在 2018年4月17日，下午7:16，Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx> 写道： > > On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 5:42 AM, Chengguang Xu <cgxu519@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> ovl_*_lower() can handle lowerstack requirement well and more importantly >> we can hide detail lowerstack implementation for outside. so using these >> functions to replace bare array operaion. >> > > In not using bare array operation a worthy goal?? > If you follow my suggestion in patch 3/3, you will be able to avoid this goal > and keep using array operations instead of __ovl_path_lower(). In this patch series, hiding detail operation of array is necessary, your suggestion makes the modification shorter and simpler but maybe lose a bit of flexibility when trying to change lowerstack layers. However, we don’t have to worry about that too much on this stage. I’ll repost modified patch. Thanks, Chengguang.-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-unionfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
