On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 5:42 AM, Chengguang Xu <cgxu519@xxxxxxx> wrote: > ovl_*_lower() can handle lowerstack requirement well and more importantly > we can hide detail lowerstack implementation for outside. so using these > functions to replace bare array operaion. > In not using bare array operation a worthy goal?? If you follow my suggestion in patch 3/3, you will be able to avoid this goal and keep using array operations instead of __ovl_path_lower(). Thanks, Amir. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-unionfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
