On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 10:47:15PM +0200, Amir Goldstein wrote:
[..]
> > - For the xfs reflink test, I am curious that why have you recommended
> > to also enabled "rmapbt=1". Is is required for the tests?
> >
>
> You cannot enable reflink=1 without it.
I could do that. Here is the xfs_info output which shows rmapbt=0 and
reflink=1.
# xfs_info /mnt/test-xfs
meta-data=/dev/mapper/test--union-lower_layer isize=512 agcount=4, agsize=327680 blks
= sectsz=512 attr=2, projid32bit=1
= crc=1 finobt=1 spinodes=0 rmapbt=0
= reflink=1
data = bsize=4096 blocks=1310720, imaxpct=25
= sunit=0 swidth=0 blks
naming =version 2 bsize=4096 ascii-ci=0 ftype=1
log =internal bsize=4096 blocks=2560, version=2
= sectsz=512 sunit=0 blks, lazy-count=1
realtime =none extsz=4096 blocks=0, rtextents=0
Vivek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-unionfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
