Re: [ANNOUNCE] unionmount-testsuite: Amir's master branch updated

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 9:59 PM, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 06:29:53PM +0200, Amir Goldstein wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 9:14 PM, Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 8:17 PM, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >> On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 10:20:25PM +0200, Amir Goldstein wrote:
>> >>> Hi All,
>> >>>
>> >>> The master branch on my unionmount-testsuite tree [1] has been updated.
>> >>>
>> >>> The head of the master branch is commit:
>> >>> 6d04664 Add a test for rename over empty union dir
>> >>>
>> >>> This small update contains:
>> >>> - A few new simple dir rename and dir remove tests
>> >>> - A fix for running on kernel <= v4.9 with no redirect_dir support
>> >>> - A new setup option --squashfs to setup lower as read-only squashfs
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> Hi Amir,
>> >>
>> >> It would be nice to also update README file and explain different options.
>> >
>> > Yes, that would be nice... will get to it some day if someone doesn't
>> > beat me to it.
>> >
>> >>
>> >> Also, how to test with different mount options enabled/disable (index,
>> >> redirect etc).
>> >>
>> >
>> > A preview for README:
>> > Basically, the testsuite tests for correctness, so if correctness requires
>> > enabling a feature, then testsuite will fail without the feature, but there are
>> > some historical exceptions:
>> > - testsuite predates redirect_dir, so I let the testsuite auto detect
>> > redirect_dir
>> >   and kept the "expect EXDEV" logic for redirect_dir disabled
>> > - until quite recently st_ino was not constant on copy up in most cases,
>> >   so the verification of constant ino was added as an opt-in feature
>> > with --verify
>> >
>> >
>> >>> With index enabled, there are no known failures.
>> >>> With index disabled this test fails on non-constant st_ino for lower hardlink
>> >>> copy up:
>> >>>   run --ov=1 --samefs --verify rename-mass-5
>> >
>> > Thus, this test fails because with index disabled, hardlink is broken on copy up
>> > and does not preserve st_ino.
>> >
>>
>> Vivek,
>>
>> I added documentation about all the features I added to unionmount-testsuite at:
>> https://github.com/amir73il/overlayfs/wiki/Overlayfs-testing#Unionmount_testsuite
>>
>> Will add that link to README on the next master branch update.
>> Let me know if there is anything missing for you in this wiki page.
>
> Hi Amir,
>
> Thanks a lot for this documentation. I tested it and it works for me. So
> far I was only running "./run --ov". Now I can do samefs setups and also
> verify index feature etc.
>
> Two minor nits/queries.
>
> - Right now "./run --ov --samefs -s" fails if "/base" directory is not
>   there. So in mkdir command, add "base" to the list also.

Fix. Thanks for review!

>
> - For the xfs reflink test, I am curious that why have you recommended
>   to also enabled "rmapbt=1". Is is required for the tests?
>

You cannot enable reflink=1 without it.

Amir.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-unionfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems Devel]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux