On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 5:30 PM, cgxu <cgxu@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Amir > > Per the previous discussion, my opinion is calling __sync_filesystem() in ovl_sync_fs() > would be better for current stage. If we pick up overlayfs’s dirty inodes we may need to > involve writeback and cgroup logics in overlayfs and put all things into sync_fs seems > quite heavy and complex. If you agree I’ll make new patch for review. > That sounds good to me. Thanks, Amir. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-unionfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
