On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 3:52 PM, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 03:41:56PM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 3:16 PM, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 12:14:05PM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote: >> >> Miklos, >> >> >> >> Following your comments on the 'stable inodes' series from last week, >> >> this series fixes constant inode numbers for stat(2) with any layer >> >> configuration. >> >> >> >> For the case of all *lower* layers on same fs that supports NFS export, >> >> redirect by file handle will be used to optimize the lookup of the copy >> >> up origin of non-dir inode. >> > >> > I was trying to run unionmount-testsuite (original from dhowells) and I >> > disabled layer check. Looks like empty directory rename test fails. >> > >> > *** >> > *** ./run --ov --ts=0 rename-empty-dir >> > *** >> > TEST rename-empty-dir.py:10: Rename empty dir and rename back >> > ./run --rename /mnt/a/empty100 /mnt/a/no_dir100 >> > /mnt/a/empty100: Unexpected error: Invalid cross-device link >> > >> >> Strange... I can't find code in recent times when this used to work >> It certainly doesn't look like it should work with kernel v4.10 >> and redirect_dir=off. >> I couldn't the point of regression by looking at the change log. >> You'd need to bisect to find the regression patch. >> >> Are you not compiling kernel with redirect_dir? >> CONFIG_OVERLAY_FS_REDIRECT_DIR=y > > I noticed that I am running with REDIRECT_DIR=n. > > I also re-ran the tests without your patches and test is still broken. So > it is not due to your current patch series. > > It has been long time since I ran these tests. I suspect that we might > have changed this behavior during redirect directory patches. > > So question is, is this a regression or expected behavior. That is with > REDIRECT_DIR=n, renames of empty directory will be denied too. > It must be a regression, although I can't think why anyone would care. If one really cares about renaming lower empty directories, why not enable REDIRECT_DIR? >> >> I guess not. If you do compile or mount with -o redirect_dir=on, >> you will need some minimal patches to unionmount-testsuite >> that set the expectations correctly for directory rename. >> >> The last stable branch I have from testing v4.10 is this: >> https://github.com/amir73il/unionmount-testsuite/commits/ovl_rename_dir >> >> But you may as well take my most recent branch for testing const ino: >> https://github.com/amir73il/unionmount-testsuite/commits/overlayfs-devel > > I guess I should start using your copy of unionmount-testsuite. > > Vivek -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-unionfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
