On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 03:41:56PM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote: > On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 3:16 PM, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 12:14:05PM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote: > >> Miklos, > >> > >> Following your comments on the 'stable inodes' series from last week, > >> this series fixes constant inode numbers for stat(2) with any layer > >> configuration. > >> > >> For the case of all *lower* layers on same fs that supports NFS export, > >> redirect by file handle will be used to optimize the lookup of the copy > >> up origin of non-dir inode. > > > > I was trying to run unionmount-testsuite (original from dhowells) and I > > disabled layer check. Looks like empty directory rename test fails. > > > > *** > > *** ./run --ov --ts=0 rename-empty-dir > > *** > > TEST rename-empty-dir.py:10: Rename empty dir and rename back > > ./run --rename /mnt/a/empty100 /mnt/a/no_dir100 > > /mnt/a/empty100: Unexpected error: Invalid cross-device link > > > > Strange... I can't find code in recent times when this used to work > It certainly doesn't look like it should work with kernel v4.10 > and redirect_dir=off. > I couldn't the point of regression by looking at the change log. > You'd need to bisect to find the regression patch. > > Are you not compiling kernel with redirect_dir? > CONFIG_OVERLAY_FS_REDIRECT_DIR=y I noticed that I am running with REDIRECT_DIR=n. I also re-ran the tests without your patches and test is still broken. So it is not due to your current patch series. It has been long time since I ran these tests. I suspect that we might have changed this behavior during redirect directory patches. So question is, is this a regression or expected behavior. That is with REDIRECT_DIR=n, renames of empty directory will be denied too. > > I guess not. If you do compile or mount with -o redirect_dir=on, > you will need some minimal patches to unionmount-testsuite > that set the expectations correctly for directory rename. > > The last stable branch I have from testing v4.10 is this: > https://github.com/amir73il/unionmount-testsuite/commits/ovl_rename_dir > > But you may as well take my most recent branch for testing const ino: > https://github.com/amir73il/unionmount-testsuite/commits/overlayfs-devel I guess I should start using your copy of unionmount-testsuite. Vivek -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-unionfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
