Re: [overlay] what's the purpose for setting RENAME_EXCHANGE when dest is WHITEOUT dev

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 11:01 AM, 王旭 <xuw2015@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>   I read the source code of overlay fs, it's amazing, but a few
> confusion for the rename2 function.
>
>   Here is the code:
> 799     if (overwrite) {
>
> 800         if (old_opaque) {
> 801             if (new->d_inode || !new_opaque) {
> 802                 /* Whiteout source */
> 803                 flags |= RENAME_WHITEOUT;
> 804             } else {
> 805                 /* Switch whiteouts */
> 806                 flags |= RENAME_EXCHANGE;
> 807             }
> 808         } else if (is_dir && !new->d_inode && new_opaque) {
> 809             flags |= RENAME_EXCHANGE;
>                   ^^^^^^^^^^Is necessary to use RENAME_EXCHANGE? why
> not let vfs_rename to remove the new(dest) entry?

Source is a directory, dest is a whiteout represented by a chardev.
There's a rule that directory can only overwrite directory and
non-directory can only overwrite non-directory.

Thanks,
Miklos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-unionfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems Devel]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux