On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 05:13:00PM +0430, ahmadkhorrami wrote: > Hi, > Please confirm my thought in the previous email, if it is correct. > Regards. > On 2020-03-30 23:35, ahmadkhorrami wrote: > > > Hi, > > Sorry, I did not pay attention to the fact that we need debug info to be > > able to decode the callchain. So, without complete debug info the > > backtrace (either the symbols or the addresses) is bogus. But you say > > that the backtrace portions containing binaries with full debug info are > > OK. Am I right? Please confirm if this is the case. > > If so, these portions may be enough for my current usecase. you need debuginfo to resolve symbols and inlines, raw addresses should be coorect jirka
|