Re: increase size of number of possible tracing events

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: increase size of number of possible tracing events
From: Anthony Eden <aeden@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2019 10:31:05 -0400
Cc: linux-trace-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kaslevs@xxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <CAHMsQjV_uuhf6XPB7xype--V87_d7KeEgeks-7Qfw-2GVzLSrw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHMsQjVYHY1N=X9emeYg34XxeUaMRdV--3NYFNdy111sD0-0gg@mail.gmail.com> <20190626114601.6510c943@gandalf.local.home> <CAHMsQjV_uuhf6XPB7xype--V87_d7KeEgeks-7Qfw-2GVzLSrw@mail.gmail.com>

Using ptrace to do this turns out to be absurdly slow, as one might
expect (I wrote a python script for lldb). If anyone would like to see
the actual numbers let me know.

-Anthony

Follow-Ups:
- Re: increase size of number of possible tracing events
  - From: Frank Ch. Eigler

References:
- increase size of number of possible tracing events
  - From: Anthony Eden
- Re: increase size of number of possible tracing events
  - From: Steven Rostedt
- Re: increase size of number of possible tracing events
  - From: Anthony Eden

Prev by Date: Re: increase size of number of possible tracing events
Next by Date: Re: increase size of number of possible tracing events
Previous by thread: Re: increase size of number of possible tracing events
Next by thread: Re: increase size of number of possible tracing events
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux USB Development] [Linux USB Development] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite Hiking] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux