Re: [PATCH v6 21/21] perf-probe: Add array argument support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 22 Mar 2018 16:19:46 +0530
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi Masami :)
> 
> On 03/22/2018 03:53 PM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> > On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 13:29:59 +0530
> > Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Is it okay to allow user to specify array size with type field?
> > Fro this patch, yes.
> 
> So IIUC, perf _tool_ will allow user to record array either with "name[range]"
> or by "name:type[length]". Please correct me if that's wrong.

Yes, it is correct.

> And If perf tool will allow array length along with TYPE field, I guess we should
> document that in man perf-probe?

Ah, right. OK, I'll add it.

Thanks!

> 
> Otherwise,
> 
> Acked-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Thanks,
> Ravi
> 
> >  The availability of type is checked only when
> > it is automatically generated.
> > IMO, it should be done in another patch, something like
> > "Validate user specified type casting" patch. Would you need it?
> >
> > Thank you,
> >
> 


-- 
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-trace-users" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux