Top posting now, are we? On Thu, 12 Sep 2013 13:40:38 +0200 John Kacur <jkacur@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > and when I say, I don't know whether that makes sense or not, it's > because I don't know whether all the snapshot info is in the trace > anyway. (I need to play with the new snapshot feature first) > > On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 1:39 PM, John Kacur <jkacur@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I don't know whether this makes sense or not, but I believe he is > > asking to have trace_on and snapshot on simultaneously. He wants to do > > a trace, but also have the snapshot information that coincides with > > the start and end of the trace. > > I don't think this makes sense. A snapshot "saves" the current trace buffer with a simple swap. Once the swap happens, you have the start and stop of the trace. Unless he simply wants a write to the buffer when the "tracing_on == 0" happens. -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-trace-users" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|