On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 18:01:30 +0200 "Yordan Karadzhov (VMware)" <y.karadz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Steven, > > I have no strong preference about having or not having this extra space. > For me, having the space makes the C-like casting look more similar to a > new declaration on contrary to the C++-like casting that will be > something like this > > unsigned long i(340); > char c = char(i); > > and looks more like a constructor call. > Of course C++ will not let you cast number to pointer this way. As long as you are consistent, but I'm just letting you know the appropriate style for the Linux kernel, which is no space: type x = (type)y; But again, this is really up to you, but just be aware if you submit to the kernel, the above is the expected style. -- Steve
|