On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 4:19 PM Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 12:12:08 +0200 > Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 07, 2020 at 01:07:50PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > I split out tools/lib/traceevent from the kernel tree using "git subtree", > > > which recreates all the commits of a directory and makes that directory a > > > stand alone. I then updated the Makefiles, and copied over some of the > > > header files used to build the library. I pushed this up to: > > > > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/libs/libtrace/libtraceevent.git/ > > > > > > My hope is that this will now be the source of all updates to the > > > libtraceevent library that can be used as a stand alone package that both > > > perf and tracecmd can use. I would also like powertop and rasdaemon to use > > > this as well. > > > > hi, > > I'm adding this as fedora package, is there a source arhive somewhere > > in git.kernel.org for libtraceevent that spec could download? > > > > Hi Jiri! > > Once it's shown that it works for all the package maintainers, I will tag > it which should create the tarballs automatically on the above link. But I > wanted to fix all the packaging bugs before doing so. I hope this doesn't > make it into a catch-22. Where you can't package till there's a source > tarball, but I can't make a source tarball until I know you can package > it ;-) For Debian I have raised https://bugs.debian.org/971976 but I will package it locally today just to check there is no packaging bugs for our packaging. -- Regards Sudip
|