Re: libtraceevent sync
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: libtraceevent sync
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2020 13:59:07 -0400
- Cc: linux-trace-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <CAPpZLN6Xd0fiBUxKUCn=-z5JsHRocWAUPBtmTFJ=Z6Nj6qbfPA@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAPpZLN4RkWjAFBw=wShOMhQ0ECWJnDiOyQQPP6os68pSM9VeBQ@mail.gmail.com> <20200618114657.34351921@oasis.local.home> <CAPpZLN6Xd0fiBUxKUCn=-z5JsHRocWAUPBtmTFJ=Z6Nj6qbfPA@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, 18 Jun 2020 18:55:29 +0300
Tzvetomir Stoyanov <tz.stoyanov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Same for this one. I don't think the libraries should be installed via trace-cmd.
>
> There is already an "install_libs" target in trace-cmd top Makefile. I
> think all libraries which are supposed to be used with 3th party
> applications should be integrated with pkg-config infrastructure.
So if this is just for libtracefs and libtracecmd, then sure. But we
want libtraceevents a separate repo, and eventually remove it from here.
And perhaps we will do the same for libtracecmd and libtracefs.
-- Steve
[Index of Archives]
[Linux USB Development]
[Linux USB Development]
[Linux Audio Users]
[Yosemite Hiking]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux SCSI]