On Wed, 22 Jan 2020 12:21:54 -0500 Marcelo Diop-Gonzalez <marcgonzalez@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Signed-off-by: Marcelo Diop-Gonzalez <marcgonzalez@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > Makefile | 3 ++- > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile > > > index efd9ed4..0b15bf5 100644 > > > --- a/Makefile > > > +++ b/Makefile > > > @@ -348,7 +348,8 @@ TAGS: force > > > > > > cscope: force > > > $(RM) cscope* > > > - $(call find_tag_files) | cscope -b -q > > > + $(call find_tag_files) > cscope.files > > > + cscope -b -q > > > > I think the following should work too, without the need to create an > > extra file: > > > > diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile > > index efd9ed4b..782df41b 100644 > > --- a/Makefile > > +++ b/Makefile > > @@ -348,7 +348,7 @@ TAGS: force > > > > cscope: force > > $(RM) cscope* > > - $(call find_tag_files) | cscope -b -q > > + $(call find_tag_files) | cscope -b -q -i- > > Hi Steven! > > I think one problem with this is that it requires that you pass cscope a > list of files to look in when using it after building the index. > Running "cscope" > with no arguments gives the output: "cscope: no source files found", whereas > if cscope.files is populated, running "cscope" lets you look at everything that > went into building the index. For example, I think running "make cscope" inside > a kernel repository will spit out a 'cscope.files' (done in docscope() > in ./scripts/tags.sh). > But I guess it depends on how people usually like to use cscope (I'm > no expert!). > What do you think is best? As I do my development with emacs, I honestly have no opinion on the use of cscope. ;-) Is it common practice to look at the file used for cscope? If it is, then I'm OK with your approach, but we need to make sure we update the .gitignore and clean make target to remove it. Thanks! -- Steve
|