Re: [PATCH v6 01/12] tools lib traceevent: Convert remaining %p[fF] users to %p[sS]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 01/12] tools lib traceevent: Convert remaining %p[fF] users to %p[sS]
- From: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2019 11:42:06 -0700
- Cc: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, rafael@xxxxxxxxxx, Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>, Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx>, Tzvetomir Stoyanov <tstoyanov@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-trace-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <20190910142621.0bec208d@oasis.local.home>
- References: <20190910084707.18380-1-sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> <20190910084707.18380-2-sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> <20190910071837.2e9110f8@oasis.local.home> <61a2b2ab4693535850306f396aac2a328e1d5a21.camel@perches.com> <20190910142621.0bec208d@oasis.local.home>
- User-agent: Evolution 3.32.1-2
On Tue, 2019-09-10 at 14:26 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Sep 2019 10:18:44 -0700
> Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > > It's not just for the lastest kernel. We must maintain backward
> > > compatibility here too. If there use to be a usage of this, then we
> > > must keep it until the kernels are no longer used (perhaps 7 years?)
> >
> > That argues for not using "%pfw" at all for some number of years.
> >
> > Perhaps the '%pfw' should be '%pnfw' for 'name' and 'fwnode'
>
> -ENOCOMPREHENSION
Perhaps you were not copied on the whole series.
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190910084707.18380-1-sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
As I understand it, Sakair Ailus is proposing to
obsolete the current vsprintf "%p[Ff]" extension
and replace the usage with a new "%pfw" extension
which would emit the name of a pointer to "struct fwnode {}".
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190910084707.18380-10-sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
If reusing "%pf<foo>" is a problem, then instead
it might be reasonable to have a new "%pn<foo>" for
that use instead.
btw:
Is there kernel version information available in
trace output files?
If so, it might be reasonable to change the tooling
there instead.
[Index of Archives]
[Linux USB Development]
[Linux USB Development]
[Linux Audio Users]
[Yosemite Hiking]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux SCSI]