On 1.08.19 г. 16:25 ч., Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Thu, 1 Aug 2019 15:19:55 +0300 "Tzvetomir Stoyanov (VMware)" <tz.stoyanov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:KernelShark is going to be a stand alone package, separate from trace-cmd. The code is already in its own directory, but HTML and man page documents are still not separated. All KernelShark related documentation (HTML and the man page) is moved from Documentation/ to kernel-shark/doc/ directory. New targets are added to trace-cmd Makefile: doc_gui - build KernelShrak documentation doc_gui_clean - clean KernelShrak documentation install_doc_gui - install KernelShrak documentation The existing Makefile targets: doc, doc_clean, install_doc are modified to work only with trace-cmd documentation. The new Makefile targets must be used to build and install KernelShark docs. This change was requested by Bas van Dijk <v.dijk.bas@xxxxxxxxx>, to simplify packaging trace-cmd and kernelshark for nixpkgs, as two different packages. Signed-off-by: Tzvetomir Stoyanov (VMware) <tz.stoyanov@xxxxxxxxx> ---rename {Documentation => kernel-shark/doc}/HTML/images/kernelshark-logo.svg (100%)When I first saw this, I questioned moving this out of Documentation. But thinking about it more, it does make sense. But can I ask you to keep the "Documentation" name? It just seems more professional, and also stays in line with the trace-cmd and Linux kernel "Documentation" directory name.
I agree. Let's rename kernel-shark/doc to kernel-shark/Documentation. Thanks! Yordan
Thanks! -- Steve
|