On Thu, 1 Aug 2019 15:19:55 +0300
"Tzvetomir Stoyanov (VMware)" <tz.stoyanov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> KernelShark is going to be a stand alone package, separate from trace-cmd.
> The code is already in its own directory, but HTML and man page documents
> are still not separated.
> All KernelShark related documentation (HTML and the man page) is moved
> from Documentation/ to kernel-shark/doc/ directory.
> New targets are added to trace-cmd Makefile:
> doc_gui - build KernelShrak documentation
> doc_gui_clean - clean KernelShrak documentation
> install_doc_gui - install KernelShrak documentation
> The existing Makefile targets:
> doc, doc_clean, install_doc
> are modified to work only with trace-cmd documentation.
> The new Makefile targets must be used to build and install KernelShark docs.
>
> This change was requested by Bas van Dijk <v.dijk.bas@xxxxxxxxx>, to
> simplify packaging trace-cmd and kernelshark for nixpkgs, as two
> different packages.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tzvetomir Stoyanov (VMware) <tz.stoyanov@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> rename {Documentation => kernel-shark/doc}/HTML/images/kernelshark-logo.svg (100%)
When I first saw this, I questioned moving this out of Documentation.
But thinking about it more, it does make sense.
But can I ask you to keep the "Documentation" name?
It just seems more professional, and also stays in line with the
trace-cmd and Linux kernel "Documentation" directory name.
Thanks!
-- Steve
|