Re: Kernel-shark and sched_switch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Yordan,

On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 08:55:18AM -0800 Yordan Karadzhov (VMware) wrote:
> Hi Phil,
> Thank you very much for your feedback! It is really valuable for us.
> 
> I have one idea what may cause this misbehavior. The sched_events
> plugin deals not only with the sched_switch events but also with the
> different wakeup events and if you don't have any wakeup event
> enabled when you recorded the trace data (no wakeup event in your
> trace.dat file), the plugin will fail to initialize. This is not how
> it should work and fixing this issue is in my to-do list since quite
> some time.

Yeah, if that's what the code does then that's what I hit. I pretty sure
this trace is -e sched_switch -O trace_printk only.  I'll set it back up
and try to get another and see what the plugin does. 

> 
> Would you please try recording the trace data with all sched events
> enabled and then check if plugin does something or not.
> 

I'll let you know. Thanks for your time and the nice tool.



Cheers,
Phil


> Again, thank you very much for your feedback!
> cheers,
> Yordan
> 
> 
> On 26.02.19 г. 6:35 ч., Phil Auld wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >	I'm using kernel-shark to visualize some scheduler traces. I noticed that the visualization
> >does not handle the sched_switch events as well as it might. The switch event is colored with the
> >task being switched from, since that's the pid of the event itself.  But this has the effect of leaving
> >the wrong colored task "running" in the visualization until the next event by that task.  If that next
> >event is a sched_switch again you can have a case where the exact opposite of what happened is being
> >visualized in kernel-shark. I could post a screenshot that illustrates this if that helps. Didn't want
> >to add a binary attachment to my first post.  It is especially glaring when switching to/from idle.
> >
> >I've tried both with and without the sched_events plugin enabled.  There was no difference I could see.
> >
> >I'm not the slightest bit familiar with the code here, but I imagine there could be a way to get the pid
> >from the next_pid field when the event is SchedEvent::Switch instead of the general PID field.
> >
> >
> >If this is not of general interest I'd be happy to make the change only in my tree if anyone has a pointer
> >or two on where to start.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >Cheers,
> >Phil
> >
> >

-- 



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux