RE: [PATCH] x86/cpu: Fix thinko comparing x86_vfm with x86_model
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: RE: [PATCH] x86/cpu: Fix thinko comparing x86_vfm with x86_model
- From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 16:05:29 +0000
- Accept-language: en-US
- Cc: "dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-tip-commits@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-tip-commits@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "x86@xxxxxxxxxx" <x86@xxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <20240429082242.GAZi9Y0uK-e2KGWxmX@fat_crate.local>
- References: <20240428183142.GHZi6WDu5nbmJJ_BcH@fat_crate.local> <20240429022051.63360-1-tony.luck@intel.com> <20240429082242.GAZi9Y0uK-e2KGWxmX@fat_crate.local>
> and why in the hell are there 2 or 3 patches of the same name touching
> the same thing? Why can't they be a single patch?
I made one patch per file touched (wherever possible ... there are a few patches
where ".h" and ".c" files needed to be bundled together).
> Lemme rebase the lot.
Thanks. I just did a "git fetch" the x86/cpu branch. It all looks good.
-Tony
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Stable Commits]
[Linux Stable Kernel]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux USB Devel]
[Linux Video &Media]
[Linux Audio Users]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCSI]