The following commit has been merged into the timers/urgent branch of tip:
Commit-ID: 7f2cbcbcafbca5360efbd175b3320852b8f7c637
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/7f2cbcbcafbca5360efbd175b3320852b8f7c637
Author: Yi Wang <wang.yi59@xxxxxxxxxx>
AuthorDate: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 15:44:12 +08:00
Committer: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
CommitterDate: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 14:48:24 +02:00
posix-cpu-timers: Fix two trivial comments
Recent changes modified the function arguments of
thread_group_sample_cputime() and task_cputimers_expired(), but forgot to
update the comments. Fix it up.
[ tglx: Changed the argument name of task_cputimers_expired() as the pointer
points to an array of samples. ]
Fixes: b7be4ef1365d ("posix-cpu-timers: Switch thread group sampling to array")
Fixes: 001f7971433a ("posix-cpu-timers: Make expiry checks array based")
Signed-off-by: Yi Wang <wang.yi59@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1571643852-21848-1-git-send-email-wang.yi59@xxxxxxxxxx
---
kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c b/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c
index 92a4319..42d512f 100644
--- a/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c
+++ b/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c
@@ -266,7 +266,7 @@ static void update_gt_cputime(struct task_cputime_atomic *cputime_atomic,
/**
* thread_group_sample_cputime - Sample cputime for a given task
* @tsk: Task for which cputime needs to be started
- * @iimes: Storage for time samples
+ * @samples: Storage for time samples
*
* Called from sys_getitimer() to calculate the expiry time of an active
* timer. That means group cputime accounting is already active. Called
@@ -1038,12 +1038,12 @@ unlock:
* member of @pct->bases[CLK].nextevt. False otherwise
*/
static inline bool
-task_cputimers_expired(const u64 *sample, struct posix_cputimers *pct)
+task_cputimers_expired(const u64 *samples, struct posix_cputimers *pct)
{
int i;
for (i = 0; i < CPUCLOCK_MAX; i++) {
- if (sample[i] >= pct->bases[i].nextevt)
+ if (samples[i] >= pct->bases[i].nextevt)
return true;
}
return false;
|