On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 12:58:21AM -0800, tip-bot for David Woodhouse wrote:
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h
> @@ -164,10 +164,15 @@ static inline void vmexit_fill_RSB(void)
>
> static inline void indirect_branch_prediction_barrier(void)
> {
> + asm volatile(ALTERNATIVE("",
> + "movl %[msr], %%ecx\n\t"
> + "movl %[val], %%eax\n\t"
> + "movl $0, %%edx\n\t"
> + "wrmsr",
> + X86_FEATURE_USE_IBPB)
> + : : [msr] "i" (MSR_IA32_PRED_CMD),
> + [val] "i" (PRED_CMD_IBPB)
> + : "eax", "ecx", "edx", "memory");
> }
Joe Konno pointed out that we now need the below line too, because we're
using MSR_IA32_PRED_CMD in this header.
With the existing code that's not a problem per-se, but my objtool
retpoline annotation things did do stumble over this.
Do we want to fold it into the objtool annotation patch or have it
separate?
---
arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h
index 300cc159b4a0..76b058533e47 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
#include <asm/alternative.h>
#include <asm/alternative-asm.h>
#include <asm/cpufeatures.h>
+#include <asm/msr-index.h>
#ifdef __ASSEMBLY__
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tip-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|