On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 07:48:41AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Sun, Dec 06, 2015 at 02:11:02PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > > Also, I'm not convinced we need a new 'ppp' qualifier for any of this, why not > > > just replace 'pp' with this event - 'pp' is meant to be our most precise > > > event. > > > > I requested this because the PREC_DIST events can only be scheduled on a single > > counter, whereas the existing :pp events can be had on all 4. > > > > This mean you can have 2 concurrent :pp users (without RR), but not :ppp. > > Ok. Will tooling do the right thing? I.e. will the first user of 'perf top' get > :ppp automatically, while the second one falls back to :pp? if not I'll make it so. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tip-commits" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|