* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, Dec 06, 2015 at 02:11:02PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > Also, I'm not convinced we need a new 'ppp' qualifier for any of this, why not > > just replace 'pp' with this event - 'pp' is meant to be our most precise > > event. > > I requested this because the PREC_DIST events can only be scheduled on a single > counter, whereas the existing :pp events can be had on all 4. > > This mean you can have 2 concurrent :pp users (without RR), but not :ppp. Ok. Will tooling do the right thing? I.e. will the first user of 'perf top' get :ppp automatically, while the second one falls back to :pp? Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tip-commits" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|