On Wed, 2014-01-22 at 18:36 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Your main argument is that some people don't cc lkml > > because section entries don't specify it explicitly. > > No, my main argument continues to be that having a 'at a glance' > contact summary _in a single place_ is eminently useful to humans, > because it's so simple: I don't doubt simplicity is good. > You never even > _acknowledged_ my main point, let alone countered it successfully. There's no 'counter' to it. You simply don't seem to agree that some people will choose _not_ to cc lkml when some sections have it and others sections don't. > Hence you came up with this false 'conclusion' prematurely and > presented it with baseless, cocky self-confidence. > What an annoyingly unproductive waste of time. Any discussion where someone disagrees with you seems to end with you asserting that. I doubt it's true. > Thanks, Anytime. cheers, Joe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tip-commits" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|