On Wed, 2014-01-22 at 13:27 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: [] > You have cut out my main argument from you reply and have ignored it: Not ignored. Threaded email works fine. Your main argument is that some people don't cc lkml because section entries don't specify it explicitly. My main argument, which you elided, is that some people will not cc lkml because they will see some sections with L: entries with lkml and others without, and will therefore _not_ cc lkml instead. So I think the rule should be either every section has an lkml entry or no section does. Pick one. Mixing styles just causes a different type of error. > Which is not a very honest way to conduct discussions :-( [] > > MAINTAINERS already says: > > That's irrelevant really, reality tells us that good people are > looking at the entries and are using them as-is. For such things > technology should adapt to people, not the other way around. If you are going to complain about "honesty in argumentation", try it yourself. Be an exemplar. Describing a previous change as being made for intuitions sake when it wasn't, isn't. cheers, Joe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tip-commits" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html