Re: [PATCH -v1.1] x86, boot: Further compress CPUs bootup message

[Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>]

* H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> If the goal is to feed this to the field width in printf, which I would 
> think would be the dominant use, then you do have to account for the 
> minus sign.

The input here is always a nonzero positive integer.

Anyway, I have no objections against using the more generic library 
function either.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tip-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html