Re: [PATCH -v1.1] x86, boot: Further compress CPUs bootup message
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
For negative numbers presumably we need to d++ for the minus sign, no?
Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 09:58:33PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>
>> * Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> > On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 09:49:27PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>> > > And yes, that one works too.
>> >
>> > Btw, just to be thorough, we could handle negative numbers too:
>> >
>> > int num_digits(int val)
>> > {
>> > int m = 10;
>> > int d = 1;
>> >
>> > if (val < 0)
>> > val = -val;
>> >
>> > while (val >= m) {
>> > m *= 10;
>> > d++;
>> > }
>> >
>> > return d;
>> > }
>>
>> I like the cell phone version better!
>
>This *is* the cell phone version + negative numbers handling.
--
Sent from my mobile phone. Please pardon brevity and lack of formatting.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tip-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
- References:
- [PATCH] x86, boot: Further compress CPUs bootup message
- Re: [PATCH] x86, boot: Further compress CPUs bootup message
- [PATCH -v1.1] x86, boot: Further compress CPUs bootup message
- Re: [PATCH -v1.1] x86, boot: Further compress CPUs bootup message
- Re: [PATCH -v1.1] x86, boot: Further compress CPUs bootup message
- Re: [PATCH -v1.1] x86, boot: Further compress CPUs bootup message
- Re: [PATCH -v1.1] x86, boot: Further compress CPUs bootup message
- Re: [PATCH -v1.1] x86, boot: Further compress CPUs bootup message
- Re: [PATCH -v1.1] x86, boot: Further compress CPUs bootup message
- Re: [PATCH -v1.1] x86, boot: Further compress CPUs bootup message
- Re: [PATCH -v1.1] x86, boot: Further compress CPUs bootup message
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Stable Commits]
[Linux Stable Kernel]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux USB Devel]
[Linux Video &Media]
[Linux Audio Users]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCSI]