Re: [PATCH -v1.1] x86, boot: Further compress CPUs bootup message

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



For negative numbers presumably we need to d++ for the minus sign, no?

Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 09:58:33PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> 
>> * Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 
>> > On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 09:49:27PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>> > > And yes, that one works too.
>> > 
>> > Btw, just to be thorough, we could handle negative numbers too:
>> > 
>> > int num_digits(int val)
>> > {
>> >         int m = 10;
>> >         int d = 1;
>> > 
>> >         if (val < 0)
>> >                 val = -val;
>> > 
>> >         while (val >= m) {
>> >                 m *= 10;
>> >                 d++;
>> >         }
>> > 
>> >         return d;
>> > }
>> 
>> I like the cell phone version better!
>
>This *is* the cell phone version + negative numbers handling.

-- 
Sent from my mobile phone.  Please pardon brevity and lack of formatting.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tip-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Stable Commits]     [Linux Stable Kernel]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Video &Media]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux