On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 8:21 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 02/11/2013 07:33 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 5:37 PM, tip-bot for H. Peter Anvin >> <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> However, we can declare a bitfield using sizeof(), which is legal >>> because sizeof() is a constant expression. This quiets the warning, >>> although the code generated isn't 100% identical from the baseline >>> before 96477b4 x86-32: Add support for 64bit get_user(): >> >> Christ. This is so ugly that it's almost a work of art. > > :) > >> Has anybody run this past any gcc developers? And if so, did they run >> away screaming? > > I haven't no... H.J., any comments on this patch? > Can you do something similar to what we did in glibc: http://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=patch;h=c515fb5148f1d81d5f7736825e14c7502c15432a -- H.J. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tip-commits" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html