On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 5:37 PM, tip-bot for H. Peter Anvin
<hpa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> However, we can declare a bitfield using sizeof(), which is legal
> because sizeof() is a constant expression. This quiets the warning,
> although the code generated isn't 100% identical from the baseline
> before 96477b4 x86-32: Add support for 64bit get_user():
Christ. This is so ugly that it's almost a work of art.
Has anybody run this past any gcc developers? And if so, did they run
away screaming?
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tip-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|