Re: [tip:sched/numa] mm/mpol: Lazy migrate a process/vma
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [tip:sched/numa] mm/mpol: Lazy migrate a process/vma
- From: Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 16:14:15 -0700
- Cc: hpa@xxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx, torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, pjt@xxxxxxxxxx, cl@xxxxxxxxx, riel@xxxxxxxxxx, bharata.rao@xxxxxxxxx, akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Lee.Schermerhorn@xxxxxx, aarcange@xxxxxxxxxx, danms@xxxxxxxxxx, suresh.b.siddha@xxxxxxxxx, tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-tip-commits@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <tip-pdhg3wh71m4eu8xerantpvln@git.kernel.org> (tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra's message of "Fri, 18 May 2012 03:33:08 -0700")
- User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux)
tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> +
> + /*
> + * Obtain a more-or-less correct nodemask to find which pages we need
> + * to unmap so that MoF can put them right again.
> + *
> + * Not quite correct for INTERLEAVE, that would need us doing
> + * offset_il_node() from check_pte_entry().
> + *
> + * Also not quite correct for task policies since we don't have a task,
> + * approximate by having @node function as local / task-home-node.
Hmm, so this destroys existing numa policies for already running processes?
Andrea's original THP had a similar problem, and it caused serious
performance problems before it was fixed.
I also seem to miss the benchmark numbers justifying all that code.
-Andi
--
ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Speaking for myself only
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tip-commits" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Stable Commits]
[Linux Stable Kernel]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux USB Devel]
[Linux Video &Media]
[Linux Audio Users]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCSI]