* Arne Jansen <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > As long as it doesn't scramble the order of the messages, the > > delay imho doesn't matter even in very printk-heavy debugging > > sessions. > > And, as important, doesn't reduce the throughput of printk. Having > only 100 wakeups/s sounds like the throughput is limited to > 100xsizeof(ring buffer). Nah. I for example *always* kill klogd during such printk based debugging sessions, because it's *already* very easy to overflow its buffering abilities. Also, klogd often interferes with debugging. So i make the log buffer big enough to contain enough debugging info. So it's a non-issue IMHO. Linus, what do you think? Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tip-commits" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|