On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 17:26 +0100, Stephane Eranian wrote: >> > @@ -37,14 +43,16 @@ static struct event_constraint intel_core2_event_constraints[] = >> > INTEL_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x18, 0x1), /* IDLE_DURING_DIV */ >> > INTEL_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x19, 0x2), /* DELAYED_BYPASS */ >> > INTEL_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0xa1, 0x1), /* RS_UOPS_DISPATCH_CYCLES */ >> > + INTEL_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0xc9, 0x1), /* ITLB_MISS_RETIRED (T30-9) */ >> >> Where does the constraint on ITLB_MISS_RETIRED come from? > > Intel® 64 and IA-32 Architectures Software Developer’s Manual > Volume 3B: System Programming Guide, Part 2 > > Dec 2009 (253669) > > Section 30.4.3, Table 30-9 > I am not so sure about this one. I will double check. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tip-commits" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|