On 03/02/25 11:01, Jon Hunter wrote: > Hi Juri, > > On 16/01/2025 15:55, Juri Lelli wrote: > > On 16/01/25 13:14, Jon Hunter wrote: ... > > > [ 210.595431] dl_bw_manage: cpu=5 cap=3072 fair_server_bw=52428 total_bw=209712 dl_bw_cpus=4 > > > [ 210.606269] dl_bw_manage: cpu=4 cap=2048 fair_server_bw=52428 total_bw=157284 dl_bw_cpus=3 > > > [ 210.617281] dl_bw_manage: cpu=3 cap=1024 fair_server_bw=52428 total_bw=104856 dl_bw_cpus=2 > > > [ 210.627205] dl_bw_manage: cpu=2 cap=1024 fair_server_bw=52428 total_bw=262140 dl_bw_cpus=2 > > > [ 210.637752] dl_bw_manage: cpu=1 cap=0 fair_server_bw=52428 total_bw=262140 dl_bw_cpus=1 > > ^ > > Different than before but still not what I expected. Looks like there > > are conditions/path I currently cannot replicate on my setup, so more > > thinking. Unfortunately I will be out traveling next week, so this > > might required a bit of time. > > > I see that this is now in the mainline and our board is still failing to > suspend. Let me know if there is anything else you need me to test. Ah, can you actually add 'sched_verbose' and to your kernel cmdline? It should print our additional debug info on the console when domains get reconfigured by hotplug/suspends, e.g. dl_bw_manage: cpu=3 cap=3072 fair_server_bw=52428 total_bw=209712 dl_bw_cpus=4 CPU0 attaching NULL sched-domain. CPU3 attaching NULL sched-domain. CPU4 attaching NULL sched-domain. CPU5 attaching NULL sched-domain. CPU0 attaching sched-domain(s): domain-0: span=0,4-5 level=MC groups: 0:{ span=0 cap=766 }, 4:{ span=4 cap=908 }, 5:{ span=5 cap=989 } CPU4 attaching sched-domain(s): domain-0: span=0,4-5 level=MC groups: 4:{ span=4 cap=908 }, 5:{ span=5 cap=989 }, 0:{ span=0 cap=766 } CPU5 attaching sched-domain(s): domain-0: span=0,4-5 level=MC groups: 5:{ span=5 cap=989 }, 0:{ span=0 cap=766 }, 4:{ span=4 cap=908 } root domain span: 0,4-5 rd 0,4-5: Checking EAS, CPUs do not have asymmetric capacities psci: CPU3 killed (polled 0 ms) Can you please share this information as well if you are able to collect it (while still running with my last proposed fix)? Thanks! Juri