Re: [PATCH v2 3/2] sched/deadline: Check bandwidth overflow earlier for hotplug

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 13/01/2025 09:32, Juri Lelli wrote:
On 10/01/25 18:40, Jon Hunter wrote:

...

With the above I see the following ...

[   53.919672] dl_bw_manage: cpu=5 cap=3072 fair_server_bw=52428 total_bw=209712 dl_bw_cpus=4
[   53.930608] dl_bw_manage: cpu=4 cap=2048 fair_server_bw=52428 total_bw=157284 dl_bw_cpus=3
[   53.941601] dl_bw_manage: cpu=3 cap=1024 fair_server_bw=52428 total_bw=104856 dl_bw_cpus=2

So far so good.

[   53.952186] dl_bw_manage: cpu=2 cap=1024 fair_server_bw=52428 total_bw=576708 dl_bw_cpus=2

But, this above doesn't sound right.

[   53.962938] dl_bw_manage: cpu=1 cap=0 fair_server_bw=52428 total_bw=576708 dl_bw_cpus=1
[   53.971068] Error taking CPU1 down: -16
[   53.974912] Non-boot CPUs are not disabled

What is the topology of your board?

Are you using any cpuset configuration for partitioning CPUs?


I just noticed that by default we do boot this board with 'isolcpus=1-2'. I see that this is a deprecated cmdline argument now and I must admit I don't know the history of this for this specific board. It is quite old now.

Thierry, I am curious if you have this set for Tegra186 or not? Looks like our BSP (r35 based) sets this by default.

I did try removing this and that does appear to fix it.

Juri, let me know your thoughts.

Thanks!
Jon

--
nvpublic





[Index of Archives]     [ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux