Re: [PATCH v1 0/4] hte: Improve GPIO handling and other cleanups

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/11/23 3:06 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 11:33:51AM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 5:18 PM Andy Shevchenko
>> <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> This is a series provides a new API to GPIO library (so far only
>>> available in the GPIO tree), and respective update to the Tegra
>>> HTE driver. On top a couple of other cleaups (patches 3 & 4, they
>>> can be applied separately).
>>>
>>> Patch 2 inherited tags from its respective discussion thread [1],
>>> but I believe the Tested-by needs to be confirmed again.
>>>
>>> Due to dependencies this either should be applied to the GPIO tree,
>>> or to the HTE when GPIO updates land the upstream (optionally with
>>> the first patch be applied even now to the GPIO tree independently).
>>>
>>> Another option is to have an immutable branch or tag, but I assume
>>> that was discussed and rejected (?) in [1].
>>
>> The series looks good to me. I'd like to take patches 1 and 2 through
>> the GPIO tree once v2 is out. This way we could potentially remove
>> gpiochip_find() for v6.7 already.
> 
> It would be nice to see it being removed sooner than later!
> I'm waiting for the test results by Dipen, I'll send the v2
> ASAP if tests pass.
> 
Reviewed-by: Dipen Patel <dipenp@xxxxxxxxxx>
After correcting typo manually
Tested-by: Dipen Patel <dipenp@xxxxxxxxxx>



[Index of Archives]     [ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux